|
THE
USE OF QUOTATIONS
These are of two kinds: from Scripture, and elsewhere. The
latter may be from newspapers or journals, from works of reference
(including dictionaries), or from the writings of authorities
in their own spheres. All of these should be used sparingly.
Most men are as well informed on public affairs. as we are,
and the most we should permit ourselves is to remind them
of them in pithy phrases from men whose opinions are valued.
Occasionally there is a vivid commentary on a scripture prophecy
by an unwitting vindicator, and then the comparison of the
two can be highly profitable, as witness the time honoured
example of bro. Thomas's anticipation of Britain's interest
in Palestine, and the subsequent Balfour Declaration.37 But
there is an evil which I have seen, and that is the brother
who will devote quite half of his lecture to a string of newspaper
cuttings on present events, and turn at last to his duty with
the naive words, " Let us now see what the Bible has
to say..."
Much
the same goes for quoting authorities. It is too easy to pick
our authority to suit our case, knowing full well that most
men (of science, say) whose opinions count, think the other
way. The audience may be no more scientific than we are, and
so be unaware that it is being deceived, which is a moral
wrong; or it may happen to know more than we do, which is
a practical disaster. True, we may say that " Lord Kelvin
believed this, and so does Sir Ambrose Fleming, though most
scientists think differently", as a means of showing
in its true perspective that some eminent men of science find
no incompatibility between their profession and their faith
in the Bible. And we may sometimes find the case we hold vindicated
from our opponents, when their support may be used without
reserve, as when Dr. Julian Huxley recognizes that man is
one species the world over.38 Even then, the welcome saying
must not be pressed further than it is intended to go. Dr.
Julian Huxley does not believe in creation.
Dictionaries
are tedious things. If we do not know the meaning of a word
let us go there for it, but it is hardly ever worth while
to quote it. If we chose the word ourselves, let us choose
another one which does not need explaining; if it is a scripture
word the dictionary may not tell us its scriptural meaning.39
Our addresses will be much more natural if we do not interpose
dry and bulky volumes between ourselves and the audience.
The
Scripture is a different matter. The question is not whether
we shall quote, but how often and in what manner. Some lectures
(and they used to be acceptable) may give us a dozen disconnected
quotations one after another, turning up them all, to prove
an isolated point. It is not now the best way. People are
too ignorant of their Bibles nowadays to do anything but gasp
when we rush them helter skelter through its pages, throwing
strange names like " Zechariah," " Ecclesiastes"
and " The Second Epistle to the Thessalonians "
at them as we go. Our Bible references must be more carefully
planned for their needs than this. Sometimes we can help by
restricting our major references deliberately to a small portion
of the Bible, a Gospel, for example, letting the stranger
keep his finger there, and showing him as we proceed that
there are connections with other Scriptures at the salient
points; but we can nearly always pick out half a dozen or
so (rarely many more) critical quotations upon which our argument
hinges, ask the listeners to turn to them, and let them accept
our word that the other allusions we make are also to be found
in the Bible.40
And
always remember how slight their knowledge is. Give simple
(but not patronizing) instructions, if need be, whereabouts
the book is to be found: " The next to the last book
in the Old Testament," " Two books further on from
our last reference," and so on. Let not the audience
be told, " We remember it was after Abraham had left
Lot that God promised him . . ." for the audience of
strangers does not remember. If it is a new audience, it has
never heard of it before.
When
we quote, we will always quote (or describe) sufficient of
the setting to show that the words were meant to mean what
we say they do. " Ye shall not surely die "41 is
a black lie though it occur in the Scripture. We are pleased
to point that one out, but we need to show the same care even
with sentiments we wish to establish. We should be sure that
the context of every passage we use bears out our application
of it.
|