|
PART
II
THE IDENTITY OF BABYLON
THE
GREAT ENEMY OF THE TRUTH
Bro. Whittaker
validly points out in chapter 8 of his book that "practically
every prophecy of the Old Testament springs out of the immediate
circumstances surrounding the prophet at the time of writing."
But then he writes:
"At
the time when the prophecy was given to John (A.D. 66),
the outstanding circumstances of importance to the early
believers were the ferocious persecution of the Christians
by Nero, and the seething restlessness and turmoil in Judaea
which already gave plain promise of worse to come in the
troubles of the Jewish War, A.D. 67-70."
Neither
the prophet John nor those to whom he was writing were in
Rome, where the Nero persecution raged for a short time, nor
were they in Palestine, where the Jewish War occurred. The
Apocalypse was not given to Jews in Israel, nor was it written
to the ecclesia in Jerusalem. It was addressed to Gentile
ecclesias. The real circumstances under which the Revelation
was written were (1) a time when there was severe persecution
throughout Asia Minor - some 30 years after Nero's reign,
and (2) a threatened falling away from the true faith on the
part of the ecclesias (see footnotes 1 and 2). These were
the prominent issues which the Spirit, through the apostle
John, had to address.
Bro. Whittaker
includes an important section in his book under the title,
The Great Enemy of the Truth, and presents a point of view
to which we must state serious objection. If the great enemy
of the Truth be misidentified, we have a problem of considerable
magnitude.
"There
can be no question that the Gospel's biggest enemy in the
very earliest days was not Rome but Jerusalem" (Revelation,
page 75, H.A.W.).
It must
be obvious to most readers at this point in our consideration
of the Apocalypse that we are not dealing with the very earliest
days but with the later apostolic era. The very earliest days
would be the time of Christ and the early ministry of the
apostles. But whether the Apocalypse was written in A.D. 66
or A.D. 95, it was written to ecclesias existing in a Gentile
world, upon whom Jerusalem had no direct influence. These
ecclesias faced two crises of the utmost gravity. The opening
chapters of the Revelation testify to both of these real crises:
severe persecution from Gentile sources
1 and a growing apostasy.2
The growth
and influence of gnosticism during the late apostolic period
was perhaps the greatest evil the disciples had to face. Attempts
to blend Christian doctrine with a variety of theosophical
ideas posed the most severe threat to the gospel. Paganism,
astrology, Platonism, hellenized Zoroastrianism, Judaism,
magic - these were all exerting their influence.3
False teachings characterized by the terms Balaam (a non-Jew
who caused Israel to sin) and Jezebel (a Zidonian who promoted
Baal worship in Israel) had found their way into the ecclesia
(Rev. 2: 14, 20; Num. 31: 16; 1 Kings 16: 31). There is a
striking parallel in the way in which both Israel in the Old
Testament and the first century Ecclesia were defiled by heathen
beliefs and practices.
It is
true that in several New Testament books a considerable emphasis
is placed upon the danger of the Judaizing influence in the
ecclesias at that time. It may be wondered why the ecclesias
were not given more warning of the threat of pagan philosophies,
since these would be the ultimate corrupting influence at
the end of the century and beyond. The apostles were not remiss.
They performed well their work of establishing the foundation
of the Truth as it is in Jesus. It was necessary that the
teaching of Christ be thoroughly clarified with respect to
the Old Testament. The work and influence of the apostles
was such that Judaistic teaching within the ecclesias was
rendered ineffective by the end of their ministry. They had
not overlooked the threat of pagan influences, and they warned
of the pernicious enemy to be revealed. The apostle John would
have been especially aware of this threat, writing when and
where he did, and his epistles indicate this.4
It is the primary concern of the Apocalypse.
The Revelation
was to serve the same purpose for the followers of Christ
as the Old Testament prophetic writings had done for the people
of Israel. It had to warn and prepare the Ecclesia for the
long journey through the darkness that lay ahead. John was
ministering to Gentile ecclesias which were rushing headlong
into the fires of persecution and apostasy. It is hardly reasonable
to suppose that he would now turn his attention back to the
Jews. They and their nation had already been set aside following
their rejection of the Messiah.
It is
impossible to accept that all the elaborately symbolic visions
of the Apocalypse - chapter after chapter - refer to the destruction
of Jerusalem in A.D. 70. Inasmuch as this event had already
been foretold by Jesus himself in plain, simple language,
such a revelation was not required. Even had the Apocalypse
been written before that holocaust, it would have been redundant
and of little real help to Gentile ecclesias facing a holocaust
of their own. The great antagonist of the apostolic Ecclesia
at the time when John was writing was not Jerusalem, already
fading into oblivion. The great enemy of the Ecclesia was
the pagan Roman system. And looking to the future, as the
apostle was enabled to do, the greatest enemy of the Truth
was the Roman Catholic system. This is a fact of history that
persisted for at least a thousand years. Jerusalem, as a persecutor,
was replaced by pagan Rome which would in turn give way to
an apostate Christendom. The latter became the most formidable
foe the people of God have had to face.

1 Rev. 1: 9 (John exiled by Caesar); 2: 10 ("devil shall
cast some of you into prison" - Only the Roman authorities
had the power to imprison.); ("tribulation ten days"
- persecution under Trajan, 110-120 A.D.).
2 Rev. 2: 2 (those who "say they are apostles and are
not"); 2: 5 ("I will come to you and remove your
lampstand from its place").
3 Chadwick, The Early Church, Ch. 2, p. 35.
4 1 John 2: 18, 26; 4: 1-3; 2 John vv. 7-11.
|